Friday, August 26, 2022

Be prepared for many dark days and nights ahead

I have been reading about the push to 100% electrification in America and much of the world. With all those pressing for a "greener" planet, in their fervor they have lost sight of the big picture. Let's look at some points the fossil fuel haters never seem to consider...

1. Battery production is a dirty process. Mining for minerals to make the batteries scars the earth and the damage to the environment is significant, not to mention the child labor in many countries used to mine the minerals. 

2. Recycling is touted but there is little recycling taking place for batteries, solar panels or windmills. In fact, studies show that it costs thirty to forty dollars to recycle just one solar panel and that produces just two to four dollars of recoverable materials, so recycling is a losing proposition. Windmill blades are an alloy that currently cannot be recycled so there are thousands of those huge blades laying in scrap piles with no place to recycle them at this time. Batteries, in some cases, can have individual cells replaced, but manufacturers of vehicles are using the battery packs as structural members of the cars, meaning they will not be replaced and as of now, those vehicles will become scrap at the end of their electric service life. Recent articles show a seven year old electric vehicle selling for eleven thousand dollars used, will require a fourteen thousand dollar battery replacement, but none are available as the manufacturer discontinued replacement batteries and none are available on the aftermarket. So what we have is a giant useless paperweight.

3. We have gas appliances in our homes because gas is much cheaper than electric for most appliances. In the rush to curtail natural gas usage, and make everything electric, nobody seems to understand the huge increase on our already fragile electric grid when we move to all electric. Remove gas hot water, cooking, heating, clothes dryers and replace those with electric gobbling devices and it will severely impact electric availability.  For example...Electric dryer 4000 watts, electric stove 2000 watts, electric tankless water heater 8800 watts, electric home furnace 15,000 to 50,000 watts. Considering the average home duty cycle, on the low end that will add several hundred dollars to a family's electric bill and further tax the grid. In many areas we struggle to maintain the lights on due to lack of grid capacity, along with aging infrastructure. It's sad but comical to know that when the grid needs additional power the electric companies rely on gas fired "peaker" generating plants or the lights would go out!

4. Solar and wind power is great except when it's snowy, rainy, dark or the wind doesn't blow. In Texas their windmills froze several winters ago when it was inordinately cold and they could not deliver power. Homes froze, pipes burst and it was a general mess.  Also this year in Texas, there was a huge temperature inversion with no wind so they again went dark. Solar panels have a finite life span, usually 20 to 25 years so they need replacement as well. The cost and the recycling or lack thereof is again a problem. Nobody seems to care about this.

5. To add insult to injury the electric companies charge a minimum fee to solar users which in our area is currently ten dollars or the equivalent of about twenty six kilowatts at the .39 cents per kWh we currently pay in a tiered system first tier. (We have the highest electric rates in the nation). The utility wants to increase that to thirty five dollars or about ninety kilowatts minimum. So, why give the utility all that extra money for nothing when we can simply use more electric to offset that charge? And, since we send any excess from solar back to the grid, and are paid less than what we are charged for incoming electric, just quit conservation and use more electric which will result in the same bill? Once again, those on the headlong rush to go green have no clue about the backside of this quest. Solar was the carrot at the end of the electric bill stick but that carrot has withered away.

6. The cost for families and industry to turn from fossil fuels to electric will be huge. People who heat their homes with oil or gas will be forced at some point to change over to electric, and those costs for a new furnace will be enormous. Same with stoves, water heaters and clothes dryers. Looking at current pricing of those items it will cost about ten thousand dollars or more for the transition to electric and the bills to operate those appliances will be increasing as well. If there will be subsidies for those who have to make the change, the costs will simply be divided and borne by the taxpayers yet again. There is no "free lunch" for anyone but the utilities and the government in this deal. And large industrial users will have an even bigger challenge...grain dryers for example use natural gas and converting to electric would shut most down. No grain means no food, folks. But the politicians never think of these consequences.

7. California has decided no new fossil fueled vehicles can be sold as of 2035. Only electrics or non-fossil fueled vehicles will be allowed. Yet they have zero ability to charge all those vehicles and won't have anytime in the near future. Imagine an apartment complex with a thousand vehicles, which is about normal for a four to five hundred apartment complex. How will they get enough chargers, how will they put one in every parking space, how will they meter the electric, and what will that do the already sky-high rents? Then consider that many chargers on current networks are out of order, won't charge properly, won't charge every vehicle configuration, are vandalized, etc. And how will the already fragile grid handle that increased load? And of course all the new electric buses, trucks, trains, and other vehicles that will further impact the grid. Nobody wants to talk about that like there will be some magical unicorn who will grant us unlimited power for all the new "green" needs. 

I am not against recycling, renewing, reusing and some green energy. But dictating the ways and means you will be forced to go green just is not a survivable future for America. The powers that be have turned their backs on the dirty energy that goes to make the green elements, the sad labor practices, the filthy air and landscapes in countries that make the "green" energy products we import, the closing down of nuclear power plants instead of solving the waste nuclear fuel issue. Every politician wants to be seen as a green savior but when they find they will be very cold sitting in the dark, it will be a sad moment of truth. Politicians and over zealous tree huggers seem to have no consequences for what they do to the country. They get fat and rich while in office, take no responsibility for their bad choices, have no consequences for their actions, and just leave the rest of us to deal with their blunders. 

Another giveaway for votes and another taxpayer burden

The Biden administration just announced a student loan forgiveness program but cannot tell us the actual cost. 300 billion to perhaps 600 billion, but what the hell, it's the taxpayers money so why should the Washington crowd care. They hired all those new IRS agents to beat down the lower and middle class so they may be able to eke a few dollars out of struggling taxpayers to fund the debacle. 

I paid for my children's college education each semester, working two and three jobs when necessary to assure they had a quality education. They never had student loans hanging over their heads as they moved into a productive adult life. I never had student loans nor did I use the GI Bill for my own education. To be honest, I started college too late and my eligibility for the GI Bill had expired long ago. So, in my thirst for knowledge I obtained multiple degrees in my chosen field of endeavor, all the way to a Doctorate. And worked full time in doing so, studying at night and on weekends, and raising a family too. All this on a single income family.

So why are those who took student loans able to receive ten or twenty thousand dollars in loan forgiveness on the backs of taxpayers? And why this burden for many taxpayers who never went to college? Those who sought careers in jobs not requiring a college degree and who were, and are, highly productive members of society? Those who paid their own way through college and are now being required to pay strangers way as well? Why are those who took worthless degree paths like Political Science and Liberal Arts and other courses that they will never get a career in getting a debt payment? Why is the person who took 12 years to complete a 4 year degree and spent the student loan funds on cars, booze and parties getting relief of a debt they legally owe? 

It's all to garner votes for the mid term elections. It's a giant taxpayer funded ploy to give the warm fuzzies to a class of people who don't deserve the taxpayer funded "gift" in the hope this will sway them to vote Democrat. 

The current administration has gone off the rails in reckless spending and is adding to not only inflation, but the grief of American taxpayers who foot the bill for all of this nonsense. Try telling a family that is struggling to keep the roof over their head and food on the table how paying someone else's bills is helping them. Try telling working people that they need to pay more and more for people who don't pay. It's akin to that family eating beans and paying for someone else's steak dinner.

This is like a giant welfare system devised by the Democrats in Washington, the prelude to a socialist society. Take from those who earn their money and give it to the whiners who not only don't work for it, but don't deserve it either. 

America as we knew it is gone...

 

 



Monday, August 8, 2022

Government logic...

I believe everyone has heard the tale of the Dutch boy who put his finger in the dike so that the town would not be flooded. Well, here is a twist on that story:


1.The dike (dam) has a leak and a little boy puts his finger in the hole to stop the leak. 

2. Government officials are notified about the leak.

3. Government refutes the problem is theirs and does nothing.

4. Government blames the boy for the hole and files charges against him for damaging public property.

5. Boy removes finger from the hole as he is arrested and the town is threatened once again.

6. Government asks for solutions to repair the hole.

7. Government refuses the Republicans answer to plug the hole with cement which will stop the leak.

8. Government forms a committee of highly paid "experts" to study the problem.  

9. Town is flooded and town asks FEMA for assistance. 

10. FEMA hires several hundred people to study the problem as the flood waters rise.

11. FEMA "experts" come up with a solution. 

12. FEMA hires five hundred people at $50 per shift and with full benefits, who will each take take 15 minute shifts putting their finger in the hole.

13. FEMA goes back to Washington smug in their solution.

14. The Democrats raise taxes to cover the disaster costs, charge every person in town five-thousand dollars in new taxes, and convene a panel to study why the Republicans didn't plug the hole sooner.

And that, my friends, is why the little Dutch boy no longer helps and why everything the government gets involved in costs so damned much.