Saturday, May 16, 2009

Poncho is Dead, thanks to General Motors

Many of us die-hard aficionados of Pontiac called the marque "Ponchos" as a shortened version of Pontiac. I have no idea when this started, but back in the 1950's when someone owned a "Poncho" you knew it was a Pontiac. No big long name, just a simple pseudonym for a great car. And, now Poncho is dead, thanks to the idiots at General Motors.

How could this happen? Let's take a short trip down memory land, to when the muscle car was king of the street. The American Muscle Car, that is. Yes, there was the 1950's Corvettes and the Chevy's and even the Fuel Injected 1967 Pontiac Bonneville and Chevrolet Bel Air, but the car that set the tone for all muscle cars to follow was the 1964 Pontiac GTO.

In the early 60's, most of the big engines were in big cars, such as the Ford Galaxy with a 427, a Chevy Impala or Biscayne with a 409 or later on a 427. Dodge and Plymouth as well as Chrysler offered big engines as well, including the 383 and 440 blocks as well as the 426 Hemi. But again, these were in big cars with lots of weight to pull.

So, along came the GTO, from the parts bin at Pontiac, built on the Tempest frame and body and infused with a 389 cubic inch engine and a 4 speed transmission, the "Little GTO" was just about King of the Street. Add three two barrel carburetors, or three deuces as it was known and called "Tri-Power" by Pontiac, and you had a potent street and drag machine that few cars could match. The Mustang came along later that year, but the smaller engined "Pony" car was no match for the "Goat" as the GTO was called by many. For years the GTO ruled the streets and was the cradle upon which the American Muscle Car industry was born, giving rise to the famed Olds 4-4-2, the Plymouth Road Runner and GTX, Dodge Super Bee, Shelby Mustang GT500KR, and even such unusual, yet amazing players, as American Motors with the AMX and Studebaker with the Supercharged Lark, and Studebaker-Packard with their Hawk series.

Camaro soon followed along with Firebird. The car that Grandpa drove, the Buick, gave birth to the Buick Grand National in later years, followed closely by the venerable GNX version that could whip just about anything on the drag strip with it's turbocharged V-6.

Then, for some strange reason, in the 90's GM decided that we didn't want what we wanted. That we wanted what GM would give us, and like it or not, if you wanted a GM product you had to settle. What? Settle? We were Americans and not used to settling for just any Iron. We wanted muscle and not rice burners and Japanese tuners. We wanted cubic inches and V-8's and thunderous exhausts. And GM and Chrysler let us down. Ford still produced the Mustang and thus, has survived the debacle pretty well, at least to this point.

GM dumped Oldsmobile. Remember the slogan they used during the waning years of that marque? "This isn't your father's Oldsmobile!" Hell no it wasn't. Dad's Olds had horsepower and could smoke most of the cars on the road or the track on Saturday nights. It had style. The new Oldsmobile was pathetic to say the least. No self respecting muscle car person would own one. Thank God it wasn't your father's Olds!

Buick was the consummate symbolism of a granny car. Driven by the aged and the perfect vehicle to clog the highways between the senior citizens home, and the all you can eat buffet in Senility City. Big and style less, they were avoided at all costs by the younger population. Then, someone got the idea to use the same body style as the Olds Cutlass during the early to mid 80's and create the Buick Regal. Then, why not turbocharge it. Then create the Buick Grand National. Now there was excitement on four wheels. Then, for the ultimate fun with a V-6, came the GNX, a Super Stock version of the Grand National. For once in a hot rodder's life, they actually could say YES to the jingle "Wouldn't you really rather own a Buick?"

Aah, but GM screwed this up too. Blame it on gas shortages or maybe brain shortages at GM, but the fast Buick's disappeared in favor of over sized behemoths that guzzled gas anyway, and were never going to sell to the kids and young adults who had money to spend. Buick regressed to the car driven by senior citizens and people who didn't yet have their AARP card just didn't want to see in their driveway

I am saddened to see Pontiac disappear, just as I have been by many of the names of our automobiles that once graced our streets. I have had three Pontiac's, a 1957 Bonneville, a 1966 GTO and a 2005 GTO. I bought that 2005 GTO thinking somehow it would hearken me back to the days when the GTO was king of the road. Maybe I thought, somehow, it would bring back 1964 and the excitement of the era when the GTO was the car to drive. Factually, it was faster, drove better, handled better on curves, and had a better fit and finish than my 66 Goat. But, it wasn't really a GTO at all, and it wasn't really even a Pontiac. It was a re-badged Holden Monaro, made in Australia and not in the USA. It was scary fast and fun, and had GTO emblems, but it still wasn't true American Iron like the old days. They only made the "new" GTO for three years, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and production ceased. There will never be another GTO made. Period.

Bad decisions on the part of the automakers, greed on the part of the unions and trying to force cars that we didn't want down our collective throats has brought us to the current state of affairs. Those of us who bought American for 50 years now turn to the imports for better value, better performance and mileage, and stability of the makers. It never had to come to this. But when companies forget that the consumer gets what they want, not what you want to give them, it all ends up the same.

Bottom line is that the tag line on Pontiac commercials "Pontiac...We build excitement!" has fallen on deaf ears, as it just hasn't been true. What Pontiac and GM has done is build apathy, and the motoring public has finally responded by saying we'll have someone else build something exciting for us, thank you. You had several generations to make the grade and failed, now it's someone elses' turn.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree! WHy the hell would GM dig its own grave?? Pontiac, Chevy, Olds, Buick, Cadillac all had an identity, fast engines, plush interiors! Heck, my 1979 Olds Delta 88 Royale Brougham has a very nice tufted interior, 350 engine and still gets 25 mpg! Why would GM kill its image? They always had long lasting good looking cars. 1977 was the major dowsizing, but still they all had their own good looks in spite of the B body platform! They were smart with interchangeability. Then they took the Cutlass and Grand Prix, in 88 and made them into ugly fwd cars, and went down hill from there. The 85 Park Ave was a joke, so small and no frame. Boy I wish GM would gt back into gear again and make attractive cars!

Anonymous said...

I cant proclaim to know everything and everything about how american cars fell into the hands of eurpoeans...

I am appaled at your story about the GTOs

What abhors me the most is in the 80s we had to deal with the Jap Trap Datuns and Toyota homos... talk about 'rice buring'...

I know a majority of the best Panchos and GMs were always- fabricated here in the us.

Parts- another matter. It sucks I recently had to put a jap trap starter in my 95 bird- new from factory- to watch it fail...

I think there's a lot more to this- but selling out to Benz or Audi or BMW? WHere does it ge one? Ok maybe you have $50k to spend but what about the dumb that spend money on Lexus that should be buying top end GM and get a quality product?

Sorry- I feel some of this argument is met with some fallacy today...

I hate to think our american companies who want to regain a market share- lost to jap traps are just fooling us....

The 2010 trans-am- turned camaro?

If its a choice between it and a celica or tiburon for same amount... sorry one sounds to feminine and another to world war II jap trap for me...

I think the GTOs that were made in Aussieland (if and indeed- its true).

I'd rather them be made there than india, japan or china...

I agree- its a big f'up pontiac is dead.

blame the republican scum that look at dollars and cents...

$70 part- japs can do it for $40... it may fail though

RIP Lexus and Toyota owners- victims of recent recall...

note to GM

Make a F'ING quality product again, from the parts, to the assebly line, its workers and the rest.

Show the world- union workers arent ripping people off at $70 an hour- that true american vehicles- don't kill...

Sorry- I'd rather drive an Aussie GTO than drive a POS KIA- any day of the week...

KIA = Yugo

All American said...

The 2004-2006 GTO was certainly made in Australia, where it was known as the Holden Monaro. Shame was GM couldn't, or wouldn't, produce the fit, finish and quality here in the US that they were producing there. Seems other countries customers don't accept poor quality for high prices as we have been forced to do; they look elsewhere for products. We did the same and that's how the Japanese, Koreans and all the others gained such a strong foothold here in the US.

As for the BMW's and German cars, frankly, GM just can't come close to the quality on models approaching the price. A 35K BMW has better quality all around than a similar priced GM model down the entire line. Japanese cars never appealed to me...it seems we're buying back some of what we threw at them 70 years ago and that's just not a positive feeling. Sure, buy American is great. But buying American while being towed on a flatbed really sucks.

If GM and the rest of the Big 3 want you to believe they have quality, they better prouce quality. Ford did it and didn't take a bailout. If GM and Chrysler don't get in gear, they'll go down the tubes for the final flush.